Their new royalty structure goes into effect on June 30. According to Internet Retailer, this new structure:
will pay authors a commission of 70% of a book’s list price, minus the net delivery cost. Amazon says authors typically get a 25% commission today on e-books from major publishers. Delivery costs will be based on file size and priced at 15 cents per megabyte...According to Amazon:
“On an $8.99 book an author could make $3.15 on the standard option and $6.25 with the new 70% option.” The new royalty schedule is double Amazon’s current royalty rate of 35%...There are a few stipulations.
To qualify for the 70% royalty, an author must price an e-book between $2.99 and $9.99 and the list price must be at least 20% below the lowest list price for a paper copy of the book. The title must also be available for sale in all geographic areas where the author or publisher has rights, Amazon says.Amazon hopes the move will mean they capture a bigger share of the market. This move isn’t altruistic, but it does mean more profit for authors. From a writer’s POV, that’s a good thing.
By putting the e-book cost between $2.99 and $9.99 this will help the reader as well. Sounds like it may be a win-win situation for authors and e-book readers.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSounds good to me. I have three books on Kindle with another coming out in April. I wonder if that applies when the author's print publisher submits the book to Kindle or if the writer submits the book. And how much of the increase will be passed on by the publisher to the writer? Only time will tell.
ReplyDeleteNo matter how straightforward things sound, they never are.
ReplyDeleteI imagine there is quite a bit of fine print, but more royalties is a good thing. I guess Amazon wants to make a step ahead before the iPad hits the market.
ReplyDeleteI'm all for making more money and more sales!
ReplyDeleteMorgan Mandel
http://morganmandel.blogspot.com
JHM - I'm no expert but I imagine your e-book royalties are a percentage of the list price, regardless of what the deal is between Amazon and your publisher. I'm sure it'll be a question to ask when you sign your NEXT contract with them however. :)
ReplyDeleteOh, unless your publisher is Macmillan, then you're probably not a happy bunny right now.
There's always fine print! ;-)
ReplyDeleteIt's good to know things like this so you can talk to your publisher before you sign contracts.
Interesting! A response to the new iPad's eReader feature and eBook store perhaps?
ReplyDeleteSounds like a good plan for authors. It never ceases to amaze me how the business intricacies of writing continue to grow.
ReplyDelete70% is a really good chunk - and better than what any publisher pays!
ReplyDeleteBut you should check out the brouhaha they have caused by delisting all Macmillan imprints for sale through Amazon (except through 3rd party.) I have links to articles on my blog if you are interested. They have recanted their bullyboy stance already, according to the Washington Post.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Mason, seems like a win-win.
ReplyDeleteI love my Kindle, and incidentally, since I got it for Christmas, I've bought more books then before I had it.
This is good news for authors. I need to do more promoting for my books that are on Kindle. They are both priced very modestly, and I think e-books should be less than the paper versions. The major publishers who are still selling e-books for about the same price should rethink their policies.
ReplyDeleteHow much does it cost Amazon to acquire, promote and sell each e-book?
ReplyDeleteI'm really ambivalent about this actually.
ReplyDeleteBelieve me, I understand as a consumer how much it stinks to pay fifteen dollars to read something on a 300 dollar device.
But as Helen said, it's not always that straightforward.
People say it's much cheaper to do e-books, so they should BE much cheaper, but the publisher is still paying all the outlay for cover cost, editing, and production, not to mention the advance to the writer. The only thing that's changed is that they don't have to print an e-book.
Should e-books be cheaper than hardback? Definitely. But if the price goes too low, I think you run into a profit margin issue.
Amazon wants everything under 9.99 and is willing to pull books off its website to get make publishers go along. Some Kindle readers boycott anything over 10 dollars and now a few of them are calling for all e-books to be as low as seven, five, even three dollars.
If prices start sliding like that now, it won't be long before that nice 70% royalty doesn't amount to much.
And at this point, it's probably the publishers who will eat the difference. A difference I'm not sure they can afford to have.
Here are two of the best summaries I've found for the problem.
http://blog.laptopmag.com/ebook-price-war
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/weekinreview/17rich.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
And before we start comparing this to the music business, let's remember that cheaper music online had a serious impact on actual record stores.
If this keeps up, Borders UK may not be the only bookstore bankruptcy we see in next few years.
This sounds fine for writers, Hel. But this whole publishing business is in such a state of turmoil, and none of us seems to quite understand where it's going. If I publish an e-book through Kindle, do I make more money than print publishing because of the lower prices and better royalties, or do I make less money because few people who might learn of my work own Kindles?
ReplyDeleteYou'd most likely make less money, Bob. More sales perhaps, but less percentage on those sales. The hope is that there would be enough sales to offset the lower amount of money. But you can't eat hope.
ReplyDeleteThis is tough. Being a no-name, my indie romance Kindle book is competing with scores of FREE Kindle books from big names because the publishers have that agreement with Amazon. The lowest indies can list at is .99. There are many of us out there listing at 1.00.
ReplyDeleteIn Jan I sold 52 books. My profit is .35 each. In June I would have to list at 2.99 to make 70%, but maybe I won't any because of the higher price. At this point, I'd rather have more readers than 70% of nothing.
That should have read "maybe I won't SELL any..." :)
ReplyDeleteWow, this is interesting stuff. Definitely worth keeping tabs on...
ReplyDeleteThank you Laura. It's so important to hear from those on the front lines of this battle.
ReplyDelete